The title caught my eye :)
While the movie started off like a romantic comedy, and seemed kind of loosely scripted, it's salvation I guess comes from this one question it aspires to take on. 'A man listening to what a woman wants'. One of those seemingly impossibles (well, mostly )
While the movie started off like a romantic comedy, and seemed kind of loosely scripted, it's salvation I guess comes from this one question it aspires to take on. 'A man listening to what a woman wants'. One of those seemingly impossibles (well, mostly )
Nick Marshall (Mel Gibson) is a chauvinistic advertisement executive, who is working on a campaign oriented at women buyers. He's struggling to get his head around it, and is hit by this bolt of electricity. And when he comes to, he finds that he now has the ability to 'hear' what women are thinking.
It causes a total upheaval in his head. One, his chauvinism is in for a threat, as he finds that all those women who he thought doted on him, well, had other views too. In fact he's so disturbed he goes sees a therapist.
And then there's his ambitious streak which surfaces and he undermines his colleague and competition Darcy (Helen Hunt) by stealing her ideas as they occur to her.
Then slowly he starts to tune in, and realizes he is so infinitely rich by virtue of being able to listen in to her vulnerabilities and needs, and to actually understand her. It brings out another side of him, the caring and sensitive lover, the father to who the teenage daughter will connect, the boss who understands his employees, and it all ends fairy tale like.
The movie focuses on this question raised by Freud......can a man ever know what a woman really wants.
I'm thinking....does this sound a little presumptuous? Does it presuppose that what men want is clear and out in the open?
I'd allow myself to wonder if men are one step further away. Will their egos even allow them to know what they themselves want? Apologies for the tongue in cheek generalization....but since we're in gender space :)
I'm thinking....does this sound a little presumptuous? Does it presuppose that what men want is clear and out in the open?
I'd allow myself to wonder if men are one step further away. Will their egos even allow them to know what they themselves want? Apologies for the tongue in cheek generalization....but since we're in gender space :)
Smitha, one needs to first qualify by stating that not all women may want the same thing and in some cases there may be an overlap with what men want. Also, I guess it depends on what stage of life a particular person is at. But yes, I see the point you are making.
ReplyDeleteEspecially after marriage women and men seem to be at odds with what they want. While the women (in general) prefer more family time, the men want to be left alone. I think this is an evolutionary trait and can be explained thru Darwinian National Selection. The female of the species aimed at keeping the flock together and ensuring the survival of the offspring while the male was more promiscuous and concentrated on spreading the gene far and wide. One reason could be because the burden of child bearing (and rearing) stayed with the female while male could walk away. And this ensured that the female was very selective about mating.
In modern societies men are not as promiscuous anymore (due to a variety of reasons) but I guess Natural Selection has not equipped them with traits essential to keep the flock together. And thus they struggle to spend family time.
To cut my long story short, I believe the differences in what women and men want can be traced to this difference in Natural Selection ...
Woah Prakash! Firstly, lovely to see you surface here at length (pun intended). And reading this took me straight back thirty years to Das Gupta's class, (he did western philosophy for us right?),and our innumerable discussions in our favorite chai adda at HCU :)
ReplyDeleteThat done, while I fully agree and abide on evolutionary natural selection, also wondering what it would take for us to function more from conscious awareness and less from instinctual space kinds.. in the present, here and now. Guess the some you refer to in your first line fit there :)
Yes, Dasgupta and Kulkarni were great .. never mind what people like Hussein and Anjum thought of them ��.
ReplyDeleteI was trying to come up with a theoretical explanation for the differences in outlook between women and men.
Determinism and free choice is currently my favourite topic. And many great thinkers have written a great deal about it. I guess there are no conclusive answers and it is hard to figure out to what extent we are free in our choices and actions...
Aah, loved Kulkarni and his logic. And Hussein, my god, he thought he already knew it all, right?
ReplyDeleteDeterminism and Free choice, always a topic for debate. I did one post on that a long while back, and since you seem to be in a mood to read, here it is :) https://smithadevara.blogspot.in/2014/12/karma-destiny-fate-and-free-will.html
You are so prolific! There is so much to read on your blog ... it will take me months to catch up on the total content. Amazing ��
ReplyDeleteAwwww...what a lovely thing to say. Thanks Prakash :)
ReplyDelete